Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489
suck pdf from google scholar
C4555060!4555060 !26249251
unlimited free pdf from europmc26249251
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26249251 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi


Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26249251 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117
pmid26249251
      Dtsch+Arztebl+Int 2015 ; 112 (29-30 ): 489-95
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section #MMPMID26249251
  • Mylonas I ; Friese K
  • Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015[Jul]; 112 (29-30 ): 489-95 PMID26249251 show ga
  • BACKGROUND: Rates of cesarean section have risen around the world in recent years. Accordingly, much effort is being made worldwide to understand this trend and to counteract it effectively. A number of factors have been found to make it more likely that a cesarean section will be chosen, but the risks cannot yet be clearly defined. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed, Scopus, and DIMDI databases, as well as on media communications, analyses by the German Federal Statistical Office, and guidelines of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). RESULTS: The increased rates of cesarean section are thought to be due mainly to changed risk profiles both for expectant mothers and for their yet unborn children, as well as an increase in cesarean section by maternal request. In 1991, 15.3% of all newborn babies in Germany were delivered by cesarean section; by 2012, the corresponding figure was 31.7%, despite the fact that a medical indication was present in less than 10% of all cases. This development may perhaps be explained by an increasing tendency toward risk avoidance, by risk-adapted obstetric practice, and increasing media attention. The intraoperative and postoperative risks of cesarean section must be considered, along with complications potentially affecting subsequent pregnancies. CONCLUSION: Scientific advances, social and cultural changes, and medicolegal considerations seem to be the main reasons for the increased acceptibility of cesarean sections. Cesarean section is, however, associated with increased risks to both mother and child. It should only be performed when it is clearly advantageous.
  • |Adolescent [MESH]
  • |Adult [MESH]
  • |Attitude to Health [MESH]
  • |Cesarean Section/*mortality/*statistics & numerical data [MESH]
  • |Elective Surgical Procedures/*methods/*statistics & numerical data [MESH]
  • |Evidence-Based Medicine [MESH]
  • |Female [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]
  • |Middle Aged [MESH]
  • |Patient Acceptance of Health Care/*statistics & numerical data [MESH]
  • |Postoperative Complications/*mortality [MESH]
  • |Pregnancy [MESH]
  • |Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology [MESH]
  • |Prevalence [MESH]
  • |Public Opinion [MESH]
  • |Risk Assessment/methods/statistics & numerical data [MESH]
  • |Survival Rate [MESH]
  • |Treatment Outcome [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box