Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10840-016-0183-9 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10840-016-0183-9 C5110599!5110599 !27613183     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27613183 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27613183 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Interv+Card+Electrophysiol 2016 ; 47 (3 ): 265-274 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27613183 |t=2016. Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{27613183 }} gab.com Text Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review JO: J Interv Card Electrophysiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27613183 #FOAvip PURPOSE: Hybrid ablation for AF is performed in a growing number of centers. Due to absence of guidelines, operative approaches and perioperative care differ per center. In this review, an overview of findings from published studies on hybrid ablations is given, and related topics are discussed (e.g., one- and two-stage approaches, lesion sets, and patient management). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases. All identified articles were screened and checked for eligibility by the two authors. RESULTS: Twelve studies describing a total of 563 patients were selected. Due to substantial differences in approaches (one-stage, two-stage, sequential), surgical techniques (bilateral or monolateral thoracoscopy, subxiphoideal, transabdominal), energy sources (unipolar, bipolar), lesion sets (applying left or right atrial lesions), periprocedural care and endpoints (monitoring, definition of recurrence), and success rates (sinus rhythm after a mean of 26 months) are difficult to compare and varied from 27 % (without antiarrhythmic drugs, AADs) to 94 % (with AADs). For studies using bipolar devices, success rates with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs were at least 71 %. Major complications such as bleeding, sternotomy, and death occurred in 7 % of the total population (of which ten complications, 16 %, occurred in the concomitant cardiac surgery hybrid group). CONCLUSION: The field of AF ablation has dramatically changed over the past years, with one of the most recent developments the hybrid AF ablation. Lack of matching data hinders drawing conclusions and creating guidelines. Early results however are encouraging. More data are awaiting and needed. Twit Text FOAVip Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review ????J Interv Card Electrophysiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27613183 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27613183 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27613183 }}</ref> Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review #MMPMID27613183 Vroomen M ; Pison L J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2016[Dec]; 47 (3 ): 265-274 PMID27613183 show ga PURPOSE: Hybrid ablation for AF is performed in a growing number of centers. Due to absence of guidelines, operative approaches and perioperative care differ per center. In this review, an overview of findings from published studies on hybrid ablations is given, and related topics are discussed (e.g., one- and two-stage approaches, lesion sets, and patient management). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases. All identified articles were screened and checked for eligibility by the two authors. RESULTS: Twelve studies describing a total of 563 patients were selected. Due to substantial differences in approaches (one-stage, two-stage, sequential), surgical techniques (bilateral or monolateral thoracoscopy, subxiphoideal, transabdominal), energy sources (unipolar, bipolar), lesion sets (applying left or right atrial lesions), periprocedural care and endpoints (monitoring, definition of recurrence), and success rates (sinus rhythm after a mean of 26 months) are difficult to compare and varied from 27 % (without antiarrhythmic drugs, AADs) to 94 % (with AADs). For studies using bipolar devices, success rates with the use of antiarrhythmic drugs were at least 71 %. Major complications such as bleeding, sternotomy, and death occurred in 7 % of the total population (of which ten complications, 16 %, occurred in the concomitant cardiac surgery hybrid group). CONCLUSION: The field of AF ablation has dramatically changed over the past years, with one of the most recent developments the hybrid AF ablation. Lack of matching data hinders drawing conclusions and creating guidelines. Early results however are encouraging. More data are awaiting and needed. |Ablation Techniques/methods/*mortality/*statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Adult [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Aged, 80 and over [MESH] |Atrial Fibrillation/*mortality/*surgery [MESH] |Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/methods/*mortality/statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Causality [MESH] |Combined Modality Therapy/methods/mortality/statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Comorbidity [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Postoperative Complications/*mortality [MESH] |Risk Factors [MESH]Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing