Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1098/rspb.2017.1904 C5666110!5666110 !29070728     free     free     free Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\29070728 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Proc+Biol+Sci 2017 ; 284 (1865 ): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29070728 |t=2017. How we perceive our own retina |pdf=|usr=}}{{29070728 }} gab.com Text How we perceive our own retina JO: Proc Biol Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29070728 #FOAvip Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area. Twit Text FOAVip How we perceive our own retina ????Proc Biol Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29070728 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29070728 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29070728 }}</ref> How we perceive our own retina #MMPMID29070728 Kirschfeld K Proc Biol Sci 2017[Oct]; 284 (1865 ): ä PMID29070728 show ga Ever since the days of René Descartes, in the seventeenth century, the search for the relationship between subjective perception and neural activity has been an ongoing challenge. In neuroscience, an approach to the problem via the visual system has produced a paradigm using perceptual suppression, changing with time. Cortical areas in which the neural activity was modulated in temporal correlation with this percept could be traced. Although these areas may lead directly to perception, such temporal correlation of neural activity does not suffice as ultimate proof that they actually do so. In this article, I will use a different method to show that, for the perception of our own retina, any brain area leading directly to this perception also needs to represent the retina without distortion. Furthermore, I will demonstrate that the phenomenon of size constancy must be realized in this area. |*Photic Stimulation [MESH] |*Visual Perception [MESH] |Brain/*physiology [MESH] |Humans [MESH]How we perceive our own retina (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing