Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.008 C4816483!4816483 !27076801     free     free     free Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27076801 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Med+Libr+Assoc 2016 ; 104 (2 ): 138-42 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27076801 |t=2016. Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed |pdf=|usr=}}{{27076801 }} gab.com Text Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed JO: J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27076801 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus's author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. METHODS: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. RESULTS: We found that Scopus's records for approximately 7% of UNMC/NM authors' publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals' publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus's affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators. Twit Text FOAVip Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed ????J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27076801 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27076801 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27076801 }}</ref> Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed #MMPMID27076801 Schmidt CM ; Cox R ; Fial AV ; Hartman TL ; Magee ML J Med Libr Assoc 2016[Apr]; 104 (2 ): 138-42 PMID27076801 show ga OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether unexpected gaps existed in Scopus's author affiliation indexing of publications written by the University of Nebraska Medical Center or Nebraska Medicine (UNMC/NM) authors during 2014. METHODS: First, we compared Scopus affiliation identifier search results to PubMed affiliation keyword search results. Then, we searched Scopus using affiliation keywords (UNMC, etc.) and compared the results to PubMed affiliation keyword and Scopus affiliation identifier searches. RESULTS: We found that Scopus's records for approximately 7% of UNMC/NM authors' publications lacked appropriate UNMC/NM author affiliation identifiers, and many journals' publishers were supplying incomplete author affiliation information to PubMed. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions relying on Scopus to track their impact should determine whether Scopus's affiliation identifiers will, in fact, identify all articles published by their authors and investigators. |Abstracting and Indexing/*methods [MESH] |Bibliometrics [MESH] |Databases, Bibliographic/*standards [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Information Storage and Retrieval/*methods [MESH]Gaps in affiliation indexing in Scopus and PubMed (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing