Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1519157113 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1519157113 C4801289!4801289 !26929353     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26929353 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26929353 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2016 ; 113 (11 ): 3102-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26929353 |t=2016. Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making |pdf=|usr=}}{{26929353 }} gab.com Text Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26929353 #FOAvip According to normative theories, reward-maximizing agents should have consistent preferences. Thus, when faced with alternatives A, B, and C, an individual preferring A to B and B to C should prefer A to C. However, it has been widely argued that humans can incur losses by violating this axiom of transitivity, despite strong evolutionary pressure for reward-maximizing choices. Here, adopting a biologically plausible computational framework, we show that intransitive (and thus economically irrational) choices paradoxically improve accuracy (and subsequent economic rewards) when decision formation is corrupted by internal neural noise. Over three experiments, we show that humans accumulate evidence over time using a "selective integration" policy that discards information about alternatives with momentarily lower value. This policy predicts violations of the axiom of transitivity when three equally valued alternatives differ circularly in their number of winning samples. We confirm this prediction in a fourth experiment reporting significant violations of weak stochastic transitivity in human observers. Crucially, we show that relying on selective integration protects choices against "late" noise that otherwise corrupts decision formation beyond the sensory stage. Indeed, we report that individuals with higher late noise relied more strongly on selective integration. These findings suggest that violations of rational choice theory reflect adaptive computations that have evolved in response to irreducible noise during neural information processing. Twit Text FOAVip Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26929353 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26929353 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26929353 }}</ref> Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making #MMPMID26929353 Tsetsos K ; Moran R ; Moreland J ; Chater N ; Usher M ; Summerfield C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016[Mar]; 113 (11 ): 3102-7 PMID26929353 show ga According to normative theories, reward-maximizing agents should have consistent preferences. Thus, when faced with alternatives A, B, and C, an individual preferring A to B and B to C should prefer A to C. However, it has been widely argued that humans can incur losses by violating this axiom of transitivity, despite strong evolutionary pressure for reward-maximizing choices. Here, adopting a biologically plausible computational framework, we show that intransitive (and thus economically irrational) choices paradoxically improve accuracy (and subsequent economic rewards) when decision formation is corrupted by internal neural noise. Over three experiments, we show that humans accumulate evidence over time using a "selective integration" policy that discards information about alternatives with momentarily lower value. This policy predicts violations of the axiom of transitivity when three equally valued alternatives differ circularly in their number of winning samples. We confirm this prediction in a fourth experiment reporting significant violations of weak stochastic transitivity in human observers. Crucially, we show that relying on selective integration protects choices against "late" noise that otherwise corrupts decision formation beyond the sensory stage. Indeed, we report that individuals with higher late noise relied more strongly on selective integration. These findings suggest that violations of rational choice theory reflect adaptive computations that have evolved in response to irreducible noise during neural information processing. |*Decision Theory [MESH] |*Reward [MESH] |Adolescent [MESH] |Adult [MESH] |Choice Behavior/*physiology [MESH] |Feedback, Psychological [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Form Perception [MESH] |Games, Experimental [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Judgment/physiology [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Models, Economic [MESH] |Models, Psychological [MESH] |Photic Stimulation [MESH] |Psychophysics [MESH] |Video Games [MESH]Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing