Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031 C5125020!5125020 !19465282     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=19465282 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\19465282 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Cataract+Refract+Surg 2009 ; 35 (6 ): 992-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=19465282 |t=2009. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation |pdf=|usr=}}{{19465282 }} gab.com Text Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation JO: J Cataract Refract Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=19465282 #FOAvip PURPOSE: To analyze the reasons for patient dissatisfaction after phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the outcomes after intervention. SETTING: Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised eyes of patients dissatisfied with visual outcomes after multifocal IOL implantation. Outcomes analyzed included type of visual complaint, treatment modality for each complaint, and degree of clinical improvement after intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (43 eyes) reported unwanted visual symptoms after multifocal IOL implantation, including in 28 eyes (65%) with an AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and 15 (35%) with a ReZoom IOL. Thirty patients (41 eyes) reported blurred vision, 15 (18 eyes) reported photic phenomena, and 13 (16 eyes) reported both. Causes of blurred vision included ametropia (12 eyes, 29%), dry eye syndrome (6 eyes, 15%), posterior capsule opacification (PCO) (22 eyes, 54%), and unexplained etiology (1 eye, 2%). Causes of photic phenomena included IOL decentration (2 eyes, 12%), retained lens fragment (1 eye, 6%), PCO (12 eyes, 66%), dry-eye syndrome (1 eye, 2%), and unexplained etiology (2 eyes, 11%). Photic phenomena attributed to PCO also caused blurred vision. Thirty-five eyes (81%) had improvement with conservative treatment. Five eyes (12%) did not have improvement despite treatment combinations. Three eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Complaints of blurred vision and photic phenomena after multifocal IOL implantation were effectively managed with appropriate treatment. Few eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy should be delayed until it has been determined that IOL exchange will not be necessary. Twit Text FOAVip Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation ????J Cataract Refract Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=19465282 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=19465282 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|19465282 }}</ref> Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation #MMPMID19465282 Woodward MA ; Randleman JB ; Stulting RD J Cataract Refract Surg 2009[Jun]; 35 (6 ): 992-7 PMID19465282 show ga PURPOSE: To analyze the reasons for patient dissatisfaction after phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and the outcomes after intervention. SETTING: Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised eyes of patients dissatisfied with visual outcomes after multifocal IOL implantation. Outcomes analyzed included type of visual complaint, treatment modality for each complaint, and degree of clinical improvement after intervention. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (43 eyes) reported unwanted visual symptoms after multifocal IOL implantation, including in 28 eyes (65%) with an AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and 15 (35%) with a ReZoom IOL. Thirty patients (41 eyes) reported blurred vision, 15 (18 eyes) reported photic phenomena, and 13 (16 eyes) reported both. Causes of blurred vision included ametropia (12 eyes, 29%), dry eye syndrome (6 eyes, 15%), posterior capsule opacification (PCO) (22 eyes, 54%), and unexplained etiology (1 eye, 2%). Causes of photic phenomena included IOL decentration (2 eyes, 12%), retained lens fragment (1 eye, 6%), PCO (12 eyes, 66%), dry-eye syndrome (1 eye, 2%), and unexplained etiology (2 eyes, 11%). Photic phenomena attributed to PCO also caused blurred vision. Thirty-five eyes (81%) had improvement with conservative treatment. Five eyes (12%) did not have improvement despite treatment combinations. Three eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Complaints of blurred vision and photic phenomena after multifocal IOL implantation were effectively managed with appropriate treatment. Few eyes (7%) required IOL exchange. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy should be delayed until it has been determined that IOL exchange will not be necessary. |*Lens Implantation, Intraocular [MESH] |*Phacoemulsification [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Cataract/etiology [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Lens Capsule, Crystalline/pathology [MESH] |Lenses, Intraocular/*adverse effects [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Patient Satisfaction/*statistics & numerical data [MESH] |Postoperative Complications [MESH] |Retrospective Studies [MESH] |Vision Disorders/*etiology [MESH]Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing