Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.005 C4613378!4613378 !26512217     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26512217 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26512217 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       J+Med+Libr+Assoc 2015 ; 103 (4 ): 189-92 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26512217 |t=2015. Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews |pdf=|usr=}}{{26512217 }} gab.com Text Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews JO: J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26512217 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The choice of bibliographic database during the systematic review search process has been an ongoing conversation among information specialists. With newer information sources, such as Google Scholar and clinical trials registries, we were interested in which databases were utilized by information specialists and systematic review researchers. METHOD: We retrieved 144 systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 4 clinical endocrinology journals and extracted all information sources used during the search processes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that traditional bibliographic databases are most often used, followed by regional databases, clinical trials registries, and gray literature databases. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs information specialists about additional resources that may be considered during the search process. Twit Text FOAVip Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews ????J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26512217 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26512217 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26512217 }}</ref> Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews #MMPMID26512217 Vassar M ; Carr B ; Kash-Holley M ; DeWitt E ; Koller C ; Day J ; Day K ; Herrmann D ; Holzmann M J Med Libr Assoc 2015[Oct]; 103 (4 ): 189-92 PMID26512217 show ga OBJECTIVE: The choice of bibliographic database during the systematic review search process has been an ongoing conversation among information specialists. With newer information sources, such as Google Scholar and clinical trials registries, we were interested in which databases were utilized by information specialists and systematic review researchers. METHOD: We retrieved 144 systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 4 clinical endocrinology journals and extracted all information sources used during the search processes. RESULTS: Findings indicate that traditional bibliographic databases are most often used, followed by regional databases, clinical trials registries, and gray literature databases. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs information specialists about additional resources that may be considered during the search process. |*Databases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical data [MESH] |*Endocrine System [MESH] |*Review Literature as Topic [MESH] |Choice Behavior [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Information Services [MESH] |MEDLINE [MESH] |Meta-Analysis as Topic [MESH]Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing