Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi




http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/
suck pdf from google scholar
C4505629!4505629 !26186368
unlimited free pdf from europmc26186368
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26186368 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117
pmid26186368
      BMJ+Clin+Evid 2015 ; 2015 (ä): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Bronchitis (acute) #MMPMID26186368
  • Wark P
  • BMJ Clin Evid 2015[Jul]; 2015 (ä): ä PMID26186368 show ga
  • INTRODUCTION: Acute bronchitis affects more than 40 in 1000 adults per year in the UK. The causes are usually considered to be infective, but only around half of people have identifiable pathogens. The role of smoking or of environmental tobacco smoke inhalation in predisposing to acute bronchitis is unclear. One third of people may have longer-term symptoms or recurrence. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for acute bronchitis in people without chronic respiratory disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2015 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview). RESULTS: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 420 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 306 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 245 studies and the further review of 61 full publications. Of the 61 full articles evaluated, three updated systematic reviews and three RCTs were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we categorised the efficacy for six intervention-comparison combinations, based on information about the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antibiotics, antihistamines, antitussives, beta2 agonists (inhaled), and expectorants/mucolytics.
  • |Acute Disease [MESH]
  • |Administration, Inhalation [MESH]
  • |Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/*therapeutic use [MESH]
  • |Anti-Bacterial Agents/*therapeutic use [MESH]
  • |Antitussive Agents/*therapeutic use [MESH]
  • |Bronchitis/drug therapy/*therapy [MESH]
  • |Expectorants/*therapeutic use [MESH]
  • |Histamine Antagonists/*therapeutic use [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box