Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2922 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2922 C4779916!4779916 !26973389     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26973389 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       World+J+Gastroenterol 2016 ; 22 (10 ): 2922-30 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26973389 |t=2016. Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems |pdf=|usr=}}{{26973389 }} gab.com Text Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems JO: World J Gastroenterol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26973389 #FOAvip With the growing number of patients in need of liver transplantation, there is a need for adopting new and modifying existing allocation policies that prioritize patients for liver transplantation. Policy should ensure fair allocation that is reproducible and strongly predictive of best pre and post transplant outcomes while taking into account the natural history of the potential recipients liver disease and its complications. There is wide acceptance for allocation policies based on urgency in which the sickest patients on the waiting list with the highest risk of mortality receive priority. Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scoring system, the two most universally applicable systems are used in urgency-based prioritization. However, other factors must be considered to achieve optimal allocation. Factors affecting pre-transplant patient survival and the quality of the donor organ also affect outcome. The optimal system should have allocation prioritization that accounts for both urgency and transplant outcome. We reviewed past and current liver allocation systems with the aim of generating further discussion about improvement of current policies. Twit Text FOAVip Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems ????World J Gastroenterol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26973389 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26973389 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26973389 }}</ref> Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems #MMPMID26973389 Schilsky ML ; Moini M World J Gastroenterol 2016[Mar]; 22 (10 ): 2922-30 PMID26973389 show ga With the growing number of patients in need of liver transplantation, there is a need for adopting new and modifying existing allocation policies that prioritize patients for liver transplantation. Policy should ensure fair allocation that is reproducible and strongly predictive of best pre and post transplant outcomes while taking into account the natural history of the potential recipients liver disease and its complications. There is wide acceptance for allocation policies based on urgency in which the sickest patients on the waiting list with the highest risk of mortality receive priority. Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scoring system, the two most universally applicable systems are used in urgency-based prioritization. However, other factors must be considered to achieve optimal allocation. Factors affecting pre-transplant patient survival and the quality of the donor organ also affect outcome. The optimal system should have allocation prioritization that accounts for both urgency and transplant outcome. We reviewed past and current liver allocation systems with the aim of generating further discussion about improvement of current policies. |*Patient Selection [MESH] |*Waiting Lists [MESH] |Decision Support Techniques [MESH] |Delivery of Health Care/*organization & administration [MESH] |Donor Selection [MESH] |End Stage Liver Disease/diagnosis/mortality/*surgery [MESH] |Healthcare Disparities [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Liver Transplantation/adverse effects/*methods/mortality [MESH] |Models, Organizational [MESH] |Predictive Value of Tests [MESH] |Risk Assessment [MESH] |Risk Factors [MESH] |Tissue Donors/*supply & distribution [MESH] |Tissue and Organ Procurement/*organization & administration [MESH]Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing