Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1017/mdh.2015.67 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1017/mdh.2015.67 C4847396!4847396 !26651187     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26651187 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538 Warning: Undefined variable $yww in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 538       Med+Hist 2016 ; 60 (1 ): 37-53 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26651187 |t=2016. No "Sane" Person Would Have Any Idea : Patients Involvement in Late Nineteenth-century British Asylum Psychiatry |pdf=|usr=}}{{26651187 }} gab.com Text No "Sane" Person Would Have Any Idea : Patients Involvement in Late Nineteenth-century British Asylum Psychiatry JO: Med Hist http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26651187 #FOAvip In his 1895 textbook, Mental Physiology, Bethlem Royal Hospital physician Theo Hyslop acknowledged the assistance of three fellow hospital residents. One was a junior colleague. The other two were both patients: Walter Abraham Haigh and Henry Francis Harding. Haigh was also thanked in former superintendent George Savage's book Insanity and Allied Neuroses (1884). In neither instance were the patients identified as such. This begs the question: what role did Haigh and Harding play in asylum theory and practice? And how did these two men interpret their experiences, both within and outside the asylum? By focusing on Haigh and Harding's unusual status, this paper argues that the notion of nineteenth-century 'asylum patient' needs to be investigated by paying close attention to specific national and institutional circumstances. Exploring Haigh and Harding's active engagement with their physicians provides insight into this lesser-known aspect of psychiatry's history. Their experience suggests that, in some instances, representations of madness at that period were the product of a two-way process of negotiation between alienist and patient. Patients, in other words, were not always mere victims of 'psychiatric power'; they participated in the construction and circulation of medical notions by serving as active intermediaries between medical and lay perceptions of madness. Twit Text FOAVip No "Sane" Person Would Have Any Idea : Patients Involvement in Late Nineteenth-century British Asylum Psychiatry ????Med Hist http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26651187 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26651187 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26651187 }}</ref> No "Sane" Person Would Have Any Idea : Patients Involvement in Late Nineteenth-century British Asylum Psychiatry #MMPMID26651187 Chaney S Med Hist 2016[Jan]; 60 (1 ): 37-53 PMID26651187 show ga In his 1895 textbook, Mental Physiology, Bethlem Royal Hospital physician Theo Hyslop acknowledged the assistance of three fellow hospital residents. One was a junior colleague. The other two were both patients: Walter Abraham Haigh and Henry Francis Harding. Haigh was also thanked in former superintendent George Savage's book Insanity and Allied Neuroses (1884). In neither instance were the patients identified as such. This begs the question: what role did Haigh and Harding play in asylum theory and practice? And how did these two men interpret their experiences, both within and outside the asylum? By focusing on Haigh and Harding's unusual status, this paper argues that the notion of nineteenth-century 'asylum patient' needs to be investigated by paying close attention to specific national and institutional circumstances. Exploring Haigh and Harding's active engagement with their physicians provides insight into this lesser-known aspect of psychiatry's history. Their experience suggests that, in some instances, representations of madness at that period were the product of a two-way process of negotiation between alienist and patient. Patients, in other words, were not always mere victims of 'psychiatric power'; they participated in the construction and circulation of medical notions by serving as active intermediaries between medical and lay perceptions of madness. |History, 19th Century [MESH] |Hospitals, Psychiatric/*history [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Mental Disorders/*history/therapy [MESH] |Patient Participation/*history [MESH] |Patients [MESH] |Psychiatry/*history [MESH] |Self Care/history [MESH] No "Sane" Person Would Have Any Idea : Patients Involvement in Late (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing