Warning: Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
Warning: file_get_contents(http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=8707731&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 445
 
English Wikipedia
Nephropedia Template TP (
Twit Text
DeepDyve
Pubget Overpricing |  
lüll
The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin Wood MJJ Antimicrob Chemother 1996[Feb]; 37 (2): 209-22Glycopeptide antibiotics, such as teicoplanin and vancomycin, are active against staphylococci (including methicillin resistant strains), streptococci, enterococci and Clostridium spp. Vancomycin and teicoplanin are both widely used in the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. Vancomycin can, however, provoke a number of side-effects, and serum concentrations should be monitored during treatment. Teicoplanin has a longer half-life than vancomycin, it can be given as an intravenous bolus or by intramuscular injection, and nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity are relatively uncommon. Treatment with teicoplanin might, therefore, offer advantages over treatment with vancomycin-provided that similar clinical efficacy can be shown. At least 11 clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin have been carried out worldwide. Meta-analysis of the combined results from these studies indicates that more than three-quarters of the patients in each of the treatment groups had a clinical response to therapy. Meta-analysis of the numbers of adverse events occurring in each treatment group shows significantly fewer reports of adverse events in patients receiving teicoplanin (13.9%) than in those receiving vancomycin (21.9%). Direct comparisons are difficult because of inherent differences between studies, but available data suggest that teicoplanin is as effective as vancomycin and that its superior tolerability together with advantages such as once-daily bolus administration, intramuscular use and lack of requirement for routine serum monitoring, give it considerable potential for use in clinical practice.|Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH]|Humans[MESH]|Meta-Analysis as Topic[MESH]|Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic[MESH]|Statistics as Topic[MESH]|Teicoplanin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH]|Vancomycin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use[MESH] |
