| Warning:  Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
 Deprecated:  str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
  
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
 
  free 
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
 
  free 
  free 
 Warning:  file_get_contents(http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=21160828&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
 in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 445
 
   English Wikipedia
 
 Nephropedia Template TP (
 
 Twit Text
 
 
 DeepDyve
 Pubget Overpricing
 | lüll   
 
 How evidence-based are current guidelines for managing patients with peptic ulcer  bleeding?Andriulli A; Merla A; Bossa F; Gentile M; Biscaglia G; Caruso NWorld J Gastrointest Surg  2010[Jan]; 2 (1): 9-13Current guidelines for managing ulcer bleeding state that patients with major  stigmata should be managed by dual endoscopic therapy (injection with epinephrine  plus a thermal or mechanical modality) followed by a high dose intravenous  infusion of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This paper aims to review and  critically evaluate evidence supporting the purported superiority of a continuous  infusion over less intensive regimens of PPIs administration and the need for  adding a second hemostatic endoscopic procedure to epinephrine injection.  Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were performed.  There is strong evidence for an incremental benefit of PPIs over H2-receptor  antagonists or placebo for the outcome of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding  following endoscopic hemostasis. However, the benefit of PPIs is unrelated to  either the dosage (intensive vs standard regimen) or the route of administration  (intravenous vs oral). There is significant heterogeneity among the 15 studies  that compared epinephrine with epinephrine plus a second modality, which might  preclude the validity of reported summary estimates. Studies without second look  endoscopy plus re-treatment of re-bleeding lesions showed a significant benefit  of adding a second endoscopic modality for hemostasis, while studies with  second-look and re-treatment showed equal efficacy between endoscopic mono and  dual therapy. Inconclusive experimental evidence supports the current  recommendation of the use of dual endoscopic hemostatic means and infusion of  high-dose PPIs as standard therapy for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers.  Presently, the combination of epinephrine monotherapy with standard doses of PPIs  constitutes an appropriate treatment for the majority of patients.ä
 |