| Warning:  Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
 Deprecated:  str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
  
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
 
  free 
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
 
  free 
  free 
 Warning:  file_get_contents(http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=20213073&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
 in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 445
 
   English Wikipedia
 
 Nephropedia Template TP (
 
 Twit Text
 
 
 DeepDyve
 Pubget Overpricing
 | lüll   
 
 Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics  in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation Duchateau FX; Gueye P; Curac S; Tubach F; Broche C; Plaisance P; Payen D; Mantz J; Ricard-Hibon AIntensive Care Med  2010[Jul]; 36 (7): 1256-60PURPOSE: Guidelines for advanced life support of cardiac arrest (CA) emphasize  continuous and effective chest compressions as one of the main factors of  cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) success. The use of an automated load  distributing chest compression device for CPR is promising but initial studies on  survival show contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the  effects of AutoPulse on blood pressure (BP) in out-of-hospital CA patients.  METHODS: This prospective study included adult patients presenting with in  refractory out-of-hospital CA. Invasive arterial BP produced by AutoPulse was  compared to BP generated by manual CPR (Active Compression Decompression).  Systolic, diastolic and mean BP and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded before  and after initiating the automated band device for each patient. The comparison  of diastolic BP produced by manual CPR versus automated chest compressions was  the primary end point. RESULTS: Hemodynamics in 29 patients are reported and  analyzed. Median diastolic BP increased after starting AutoPulse from 17[11-25]  mmHg to 23[18-28] mmHg (P < 0.001). Median systolic BP increased from 72[55-105]  mmHg to 106[78-135] mmHg (P = 0.02). Mean BP increased from 29[25-38] mmHg to  36[30-15] mmHg (P = 0.002). On the other hand, End-Tidal CO(2) did not increase  significantly with AutoPulse (21[13-36] vs. 22[12-35] mmHg, P = 0.80).  CONCLUSIONS: In patients with out-of-hospital CA, the use of AutoPulse is  associated with an increased diastolic BP compared to manual chest compressions.  While its benefit to survival has yet to be demonstrated, the increase in  diastolic and mean BP is a promising outcome for AutoPulse use.|Adult[MESH]|Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/*instrumentation/methods[MESH]|Emergency Medical Services/*methods[MESH]|Heart Arrest/*therapy[MESH]|Humans[MESH]|Prospective Studies[MESH]
 |