Warning: Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
 free
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
 free
 free
 
English Wikipedia
Nephropedia Template TP (
Twit Text
DeepDyve
Pubget Overpricing |  
lüll
Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks Schwartz LM; Woloshin S; Dvorin EL; Welch HGBMJ 2006[Dec]; 333 (7581): 1248OBJECTIVE: To examine the accessibility of absolute risk in articles reporting ratio measures in leading medical journals. DESIGN: Structured review of abstracts presenting ratio measures. SETTING: Articles published between 1 June 2003 and 1 May 2004 in Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine. PARTICIPANTS: 222 articles based on study designs in which absolute risks were directly calculable (61 randomised trials, 161 cohort studies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Accessibility of the absolute risks underlying the first ratio measure in the abstract. RESULTS: 68% of articles (150/222) failed to report the underlying absolute risks for the first ratio measure in the abstract (range 55-81% across the journals). Among these articles, about half did report the underlying absolute risks elsewhere in the article (text, table, or figure) but half did not report them anywhere. Absolute risks were more likely to be reported in the abstract for randomised trials compared with cohort studies (62% v 21%; relative risk 3.0, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 4.2) and for studies reporting crude compared with adjusted ratio measures (62% v 21%; relative risk 3.0, 2.1 to 4.3). CONCLUSION: Absolute risks are often not easily accessible in articles reporting ratio measures and sometimes are missing altogether-this lack of accessibility can easily exaggerate readers' perceptions of benefit or harm.|Chi-Square Distribution[MESH]|Cohort Studies[MESH]|Periodicals as Topic/*statistics & numerical data[MESH]|Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data[MESH]|Risk Assessment[MESH] |
