suck pdf from google scholar
PDF vom PMID16831999  :  Publisher
PDF vom PMID16831999
suck pdf from library genesis
English Wikipedia

Nephropedia Template TP (

Twit Text


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing


  • lüll
  • Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Shiga T; Wajima Z; Apfel CC; Inoue T; Ohe Y
  • Arch Intern Med 2006[Jul]; 166 (13): 1350-6
  • BACKGROUND: Patients with suspected thoracic aortic dissection require early and accurate diagnosis. Aortography has been replaced by less invasive imaging techniques including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), helical computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, accuracies have varied from trial to trial, and which imaging technique should be applied to which risk population remains unclear. We systematically reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging techniques in patients with suspected thoracic aortic dissection. METHODS: Published English-language reports on the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by TEE, helical CT, or MRI were identified from electronic databases. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were pooled in a random-effects model. RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving a total of 1139 patients were selected. Pooled sensitivity (98%-100%) and specificity (95%-98%) were comparable between imaging techniques. The pooled positive likelihood ratio appeared to be higher for MRI (positive likelihood ratio, 25.3; 95% confidence interval, 11.1-57.1) than for TEE (14.1; 6.0-33.2) or helical CT (13.9; 4.2-46.0). If a patient had shown a 50% pretest probability of thoracic aortic dissection (high risk), he or she had a 93% to 96% posttest probability of thoracic aortic dissection following a positive result of each imaging test. If a patient had a 5% pretest probability of thoracic aortic dissection (low risk), he or she had a 0.1% to 0.3% posttest probability of thoracic aortic dissection following a negative result of each imaging test. CONCLUSION: All 3 imaging techniques, ie, TEE, helical CT, and MRI, yield clinically equally reliable diagnostic values for confirming or ruling out thoracic aortic dissection.
  • |*Echocardiography, Transesophageal[MESH]
  • |*Magnetic Resonance Imaging[MESH]
  • |*Tomography, Spiral Computed[MESH]
  • |Aneurysm, Dissecting/*diagnosis[MESH]
  • |Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/*diagnosis[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Likelihood Functions[MESH]
  • |Predictive Value of Tests[MESH]
  • |Sensitivity and Specificity[MESH]





  • *{{pmid16831999}}
    *<b>[http://www.kidney.de/mlpefetch.php?search=16831999 Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis ]</b> Arch Intern Med 2006; 166(13) ; 1350-6 Shiga T; Wajima Z; Apfel CC; Inoue T; Ohe Y

        *16831999*

    Nephropedia PMID record

    Deutsche Wikipedia - im Artikel

    Hier den unten stehenden Textblock hineinkopieren

    Arch Intern Med

    1350 13.166 2006