suck pdf from google scholar
unlimited free pdf from europmc16079060    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free
PDF vom PMID16079060 :   free
suck pdf from library genesis
English Wikipedia

Nephropedia Template TP (

Twit Text


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing


  • lüll
  • An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment
  • vom Saal FS; Hughes C
  • Environ Health Perspect 2005[Aug]; 113 (8): 926-33
  • Bisphenol A (BPA) is the monomer used to manufacture polycarbonate plastic, the resin lining of cans, and other products, with global capacity in excess of 6.4 billion lb/year. Because the ester bonds in these BPA-based polymers are subject to hydrolysis, leaching of BPA has led to widespread human exposure. A recent report prepared by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis and funded by the American Plastics Council concluded that evidence for low-dose effects of BPA is weak on the basis of a review of only 19 studies; the report was issued after a delay of 2.5 years. A current comprehensive review of the literature reveals that the opposite is true. As of December 2004, there were 115 published in vivo studies concerning low-dose effects of BPA, and 94 of these report significant effects. In 31 publications with vertebrate and invertebrate animals, significant effects occurred below the predicted "safe" or reference dose of 50 microg/kg/day BPA. An estrogenic mode of action of BPA is confirmed by in vitro experiments, which describe disruption of cell function at 10(-12) M or 0.23 ppt. Nonetheless, chemical manufacturers continue to discount these published findings because no industry-funded studies have reported significant effects of low doses of BPA, although > 90% of government-funded studies have reported significant effects. Some industry-funded studies have ignored the results of positive controls, and many studies reporting no significant effects used a strain of rat that is inappropriate for the study of estrogenic responses. We propose that a new risk assessment for BPA is needed based on a) the extensive new literature reporting adverse effects in animals at doses below the current reference dose; b) the high rate of leaching of BPA from food and beverage containers, leading to widespread human exposure; c) reports that the median BPA level in human blood and tissues, including in human fetal blood, is higher than the level that causes adverse effects in mice; and d) recent epidemiologic evidence that BPA is related to disease in women.
  • |*Environmental Exposure[MESH]
  • |Animals[MESH]
  • |Benzhydryl Compounds[MESH]
  • |Dose-Response Relationship, Drug[MESH]
  • |Environmental Pollutants/toxicity[MESH]
  • |Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/*toxicity[MESH]
  • |Humans[MESH]
  • |Phenols/*toxicity[MESH]
  • |Risk Assessment[MESH]





  • *{{pmid16079060}}
    *<b>[http://www.kidney.de/mlpefetch.php?search=16079060 An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment ]</b> Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113(8) ; 926-33 vom Saal FS; Hughes C

        *16079060*

    Nephropedia PMID record

    Deutsche Wikipedia - im Artikel

    Hier den unten stehenden Textblock hineinkopieren

    Environ Health Perspect

    926 8.113 2005